Skip to main content

Game Analysis Week 3: Broncos 23, Raiders 3

I went and re-watched the game courtesy of NFL.com.

I decided to write tally marks for each play a player made, good and bad. Below are my totals. I realize there is some subjectivity, but it isn't that hard to see a guy hold a block, make an open field tackle or get a first down after 10+ yards. Penalties, turnover, etc are easy minus marks.

Defense:
57 Ricky Brown +7 (+8,-1)
52 Kirk Morrison -4 (+4,-8)
33 Tyvon Branch +3 (+6,-3)
92 Richard Seymour +2 (+5,-3)
93 Tommy Kelly -6 (+0,-6)
61 Gerrard Warren -3 (+2,-5)
91 Trevor Scott +3 (-0,+3)
90 Desmond Bryant +0 (+1,-1)
21 Nnamdi Asomugha +3 (+4,-1)
34 Mike Mitchell +4 (+4,-0)
53 Thomas Howard +2 (+3,-1)
26 Stanford Routt -1
24 Michael Huff +1
99 Greg Ellis -1
37 Chris Johnson -3
77 Matt Shaughnessy +1

Total: +15 - Keep in mind a positive number doesn't mean we played well. It means some individuals played well and 10% (as Tom Cable implied) brought down the group. My calculations above support about 20% of guys not stacking up.

Ricky Brown was all over the place. Great game. Cable mentioned it and it stands out on film. Kelly, Warren and the offensive line stood out in a bad way. Morrison's bad numbers were the result of having to cover Marshall and Gaffney in the middle zone. He sank too deep, but that is going to be hard for him regardless.

Special Teams:
54 Sam Williams -1
19 Todd Watkins -1
Total: -2 - Not much of a chance for this group to shine.


Offense:
66 Cooper Carlisle -2
44 Luke Lawton -1
12 Darrius Heyward-Bey -1
74 Cornell Green -1 (+1,-2)
18 Louis Murphy +1 (+2,-1)
51 Chris Morris -3
80 Zach Miller +0 (+1,-1)
72 Erik Pears -1
2 JaMarcus Russell +2 (+4,-2)
20 Darren McFadden +1 (+4,-3)
29 Michael Bush +1 (+2,-1)

Total: -4 - The fact that there was both so few to look at and also so little production isn't indicative of a winning offense. Some of you will look and wonder how Russell received a +2. Well, because he made about 4 good plays and two poor ones (only one of them being an interception. The other went to DHB).

McFadden stuck out. When he ran, he was racking up + tally marks. The fumbles killed him and the team. Down 20-3 with five minutes remaining in the 3rd, the Raiders defense came up big forcing a Buckhalter fumble.

If the Raiders punch it in from the 2-yard-line after the McFadden run, a 20-10 game and a potential momentum shift was possible. Instead, McFadden's fumble gave Denver the ball back and the game was a rout the rest of the way.

In a normal game these numbers should be much higher by my estimate. Quarterbacks at +15-20. Running backs with +5-10. Receivers with +5-10. Lineman consistently +3-7. Linebackers with all the open field tackles and gap filling should be +7-10. The secondary shouldn't be getting so many tally marks for open field tackles and I'd want to see a low plus tally for a DB around +3-5. The defensive line at least +5 each. Stuffing runs, sacks, tackles, holding the point, filling gaps, etc. +5 easy.

It is too easy to point at Russell. It is easy enough to point out things that killed the Raiders as a team. You can also see a lot of positives. It wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. Outplayed, absolutely. It happens.

There was no rhythm on offense and that was because the Raiders couldn't run the ball. Why? The Raiders lost the line battle all day. The Raiders also turned the ball over. When you do those things you aren't going to win.

Russell actually did a much better job with pocket awareness, reads, etc from what I know about it all. He had two overthrows (one on his second interception). I feel like he could be ready for a breakout game. Call me crazy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed]
These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before.

Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside.

It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways.

First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Earl …

Final 53-Man Roster Prediction

The Oakland Raiders will trim their roster to 53 players today. Expect them to make at least two waiver claims Sunday to address needs at defensive back and on the offensive line. As such, there are a couple guys on this final roster who could be waived on Sunday and could subsequently find their way onto the team's practice squad.

As is, I've included a list of players who are candidates for the practice squad. There is some positional imbalance on the 53-man roster as I expect the Raiders to balance it out with a few waiver claims.

[table id=8 /]

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now.

We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better.

On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002.

The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good.

As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenarios&q…