Skip to main content

Who's Better, Nnamdi Asomugha or Darrelle Revis?

Who's the best cornerback in the NFL?

Some fans think New York Jets star Darrelle Revis, while others say it's Oakland Raiders veteran Nnamdi Asomugha. It is an argument that simply cannot be won.

The Revis side will throw out his 23 passes defensed and how quarterbacks completed just 36.9 percent of their passes towards Revis last season.

Asomugha supporters will point out that only 28 passes came his way all of last season, so one can contend that he did his job better since no one is throwing at him.

So, is there a way to come up with a ranking system that would avoid as much bias and subjectivity as possible?

Stats with the least amount of subjectivity for cornerbacks are snaps, TA, Receptions Against, Catch Percentage, Interceptions, and Pass Deflections.

The challenge is to figure out a way to compare players that did not have equal opportunities. There is a yards per carry average for running backs that does just that, but for cornerbacks there is no such statistic.

My ranking is ultimately composed of three distinct parts.


Part 1: Playmaking (PM) - ((PD+INT)/TA)

This number provides a way to compare Player A, thrown at 100 times with 6 INT and 10 PD, to Player B, thrown at 50 times with 4 INT and 6 PD. Obviously the second player was better.

Weighted PM: (PM*TA%): This weights the PM based on the number of opportunities each player had to make a play.

Stat goals: Compensate for the number of opportunities the defense had and provide weight to what the player did when thrown at.


Part 2: Catch Percentage (61%-Catch%)*TA%

Catch percentage weighted based upon a 61% average NFL QB completion percentage. Allowing 62% completions would be -1% and allowing 55% would be +6% over average.

Take this result and add weight depending on the TA% for each player.

Stat goals: Weight the typical catch percentage based upon thrown at and compare to the average completion percentage of an NFL quarterback to determine a rating over or under average catch percentage.


Part 3: Good Coverage (Expressed as NT%)

In this case, how often was the player NOT thrown at on a passing play. Using snaps and TA to create a percentage.

This is the total percentage of passing play snaps where the player was not thrown at. Good coverage is assumed in this case.

Stat goals: This can't directly measure good coverage, because there are a variety of factors that could prevent a corner from being thrown at. What it does do, is provide a non-subjective measurement of the corners coverage ability within his defensive scheme and situation. You can't cheat this stat.


Results:

I know all the Raiders fans wanted to see this: Nnamdi Asomugha ranked first. Darrelle Revis second. Charles Woodson third.

I will point out these rankings are based purely on coverage, since coverage is the corner's primary responsibility.

Revis was thrown at a disproportionate amount of times for how productive he was in 2009. Expect Revis to receive the Asomugha treatment in 2010. Limiting Revis' opportunities to make plays will likely suppress his INT and PD numbers and elevate his the percentage of passes caught against him.

This is a win for the Jets defense if the number two corner is also productive.

To Revis' credit, he ranked first in Weighted PM and Weighted Catch Percentage. Revis' high TA% suppressed his numbers slightly.

If Revis maintains his weighted PM and Weighted Catch Precentage and ultimately sees fewer passes and receptions to his side of the field in 2010, he could conceivably pass Asomugha.

Where did Chris Johnson rank? 61st out of 65 players who played 50% of snaps.

Johnson was thrown at an amazing 21.2% of the pass plays he was on the field. That is the highest in the league. If there is a silver lining, it is that Johnson ranked sixth in weighted Playmaking.

Nick Harper was the worst overall. You can see the full ranking below.



*Snaps, TA, Rec Against, Catch %, INT, and PD stats provided by profootballfocus.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed]
These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before.

Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside.

It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways.

First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Earl …

Looking Forward: Raiders 2012 Free Agents

Khalif Barnes - Weakest link on the offensive line with youth behind him. Raiders will look for for other options. It's not as if there aren't a dozen Khalif's on the street each year.

Darryl Blackstock - Was a Chuck Bresnahan guy, but found a home on special teams. Would have to make the team as a reserve LB and special teams guy next training camp. Wouldn't be surprised to see him back as a camp body or gone entirely.

Kyle Boller - Hue didn't have enough confidence to turn to Boller. Expect the Raiders to look elsewhere for a backup to Carson Palmer.

Jerome Boyd - Was nothing more than a reserve and special teams player. Some good moments and some very bad ones. Camp body again and fate will depend on the defensive coordinator.

Tyvon Branch - About the only consistent producer in the secondary. Raiders will want to bring him back.

Desmond Bryant - He's been great in limited action and can play inside and out. Key reserve.

Michael Bush - He'll find a home as a s…

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now.

We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better.

On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002.

The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good.

As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenarios&q…