Skip to main content

The Case For Campbell

Every team and coach dreams of having two great quarterbacks and being forced to decide between them.

It isn’t unprecedented. The Falcons once had Michael Vick and Matt Schaub. The Falcons chose unwisely, but they still had two franchise signal callers on the roster. History seemingly repeats itself, now Kevin Kolb finds himself as the backup to Vick in Philadelphia.

Unfortunately, seldom are quarterback changes a good thing. More often quarterbacks are changed early when the offense is struggling and the team isn’t performing.

What kind of quarterback controversy does Al Davis and Tom Cable have on their hands?

Prized acquisition Jason Campbell went from the quarterback that could lead the franchise to the playoffs to the backup in six quarters and Bruce Gradkowski went from backup to favorite to start in two.

Did Campbell have enough time to prove himself as the starter?

Did Gradkowski do anything more impressive he did last season?

The answer to both questions is quite simply, “no.”

Jason Campbell needs more time to get comfortable with the receivers and the porous offensive line in front of him. Gradkowski did exactly what he did last season last Sunday, yet the Raiders still named Jason Campbell the starter before training camp.

Many will say health was the reason, but Gradkowski was basically healthy during training camp and there would have been no harm in leaving the competition open.

Campbell is a solid quarterback who got off to a rocky start. Much of that because of the vertical offense that was designed around him. A poor offensive line, deep routes, a pedestrian ground game and mistake prone defense have been the standard for most of Campbell’s six quarters as the Raiders starting quarterback.

Gradkowski has been the benefactor of better play from the team. The defense stepped up their game and the ground game got rolling behind Darren McFadden. The play calling also changed, or so it seemed. The Raiders went to shorter timing routes and away from longer routes which require addition pass protection.

Can’t Campbell also deliver on short timing routes? Isn’t that basically what he did in Washington? It isn’t as good of a fit for him, but no one is saying the Raiders need to become one dimensional. Use the shorter passes to get Campbell comfortable.

Campbell missed on a couple long throws against St. Louis, but if he connects on them next time for two long touchdowns am I even writing this?

Gradkowski came in and did a great job, no denying it. He is fiery and high strung and probably gets little bit more out of the offensive line. However, it’s the responsibility of the coaches to patch the leaky offensive line.

Tom Cable has to ask himself these questions, because this could be the defining moment in his coaching career.

If Bruce Gradkowski is the starter:

Can I bench Jason Campbell without backlash from the owner?
Can Bruce Gradkowski get this team to at least eight wins to save my job?
If Gradkowski falters or is hurt will I be able to trust Campbell after benching him?

If Jason Campbell is the starter:

How long do I give Campbell to gel before I am forced to make a change?
Can Jason Campbell get this team to at least eight wins?
If Campbell falters will I be able to trust Gradkowski after benching him?


The best choice for Tom Cable is to stick with Jason Campbell a bit longer. Give him four more quarters to work out some of his issues and to get the offensive line to block a little bit.


Comments

  1. McFadden Runs work only when the passing game is a threat. The Defense must change schemes when playing a mobile QB. I don't mind either way who starts But I do care if we lose and have the same stale results.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed]
These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before.

Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside.

It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways.

First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Earl …

Final 53-Man Roster Prediction

The Oakland Raiders will trim their roster to 53 players today. Expect them to make at least two waiver claims Sunday to address needs at defensive back and on the offensive line. As such, there are a couple guys on this final roster who could be waived on Sunday and could subsequently find their way onto the team's practice squad.

As is, I've included a list of players who are candidates for the practice squad. There is some positional imbalance on the 53-man roster as I expect the Raiders to balance it out with a few waiver claims.

[table id=8 /]

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now.

We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better.

On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002.

The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good.

As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenarios&q…