Skip to main content

It's Better This Way

Is Nnamdi Asomugha worth $16.875 million?

When Al Davis signed Asomugha to an unprecedented three-year contract it contained simple language that voided it after two years if Asomugha didn't meet not-likely-to-be-earned incentives.

Don't be confused by the name, these incentives weren't that hard to attain.

If Asomugha had played in a greater number of defensive snaps in 2010, the contract would not have been voided automatically. Asomugha played in 14 games in 2010 as opposed to the 16 games he played in 2009.

There was another way for Asomugha to earn his incentives: record one sack or one forced fumble or two interceptions. Each would have been one more than he recorded in 2009. He recorded zero in all these categories.

The Raiders have paid Asomugha handsomely over the past three seasons and for little statistical achievement.

The only why to compare the impact Asomugha has is to compare the passing yards the team allows when Asomugha isn't playing, but two games isn't much of a sample.

Blaming Al Davis for putting language in Asomugha's contract to protect the team in case he made zero plays is idiotic. It is not only logical, but good business.

The contract was written to protect the team in case Asomugha wasn't worth the nearly $17 million he would have been paid in 2011. The Raiders would have been wise to void the deal themselves, even if the deal hadn't voided itself.

Considering the unknown labor situation it is prudent financially to have as many free agents as possible, especially expensive free agents.

No one knows exactly how a new Collective Bargaining Agreement will impact the salary structure of the NFL. Having multiple free agents means that new contracts will be friendly with the new environment as opposed to having several contracts that hinder the team for many years.

There is certainly risk of losing a player or two, but the benefits for the next five years far outweigh that risk.

The Raiders could bring in two or three free agents for what it cost them to pay Asomugha.

That isn't to say Asomugha couldn't re-sign for around $12 million per season. This would free the Raiders to bring back other players or sign a free agent or two.

Al Davis always spends money on players he wants and many if not most of the free agents Davis wants to keep will return in 2011.

Free Agent Priority List (subject to change)
1. Asomugha
2. Miller
3. Huff
4. Seymour
5. Routt
6. Bush

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea

2012 NFL Strength of Schedule

  Disclaimer Some strength of schedule models calculate strength of schedule based on the opponents the team has faced to date.  My model calculates strength of schedule based on all the opponents on a team's schedule.  The reason for this is because it reduces weekly fluctuations. For example, when a team plays their Week 17 game, in the traditional model their strength of schedule would change by 31 games...their Week 17 opponent's 16 games plus the additional game played by each of their prior 15 opponents.  In my model, when a team plays their Week 17 game their strength of schedule will only change by 15 games...one additional game for each of the opponents on their schedule.

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario