Skip to main content

Burgess to Patriots for Two Draft Picks

Update: The draft pick compensation could be as high as a two or as low as a five depending on performance.

The Raiders have traded its disgruntled DE Derrick Burgess to the New England Patriots for a 2010 3rd round pick and 2011 5th round pick. This according to a tweet from former Raiders executive Michael Lombardi who now writes for the National Football Post.

For a 30-year-old player who is a liability against the run and accumulated just 3.5 sacks last season, it appears to be a good deal. He joins ex-Raiders Randy Moss and Andrew Walter in New England and is expected to be converted to Linebacker.

The LB position as it further exposes Burgess' coverage and run support liabilities. The Patriots fans immediate reaction to the trade was similar to that of Randy Moss, but they should not forget the Doug Gabriel trade.

Burgess is on a one year deal, he is 30, and he is changing positions.

Burgess is more of a technician. He used his hands well to separate from the slower RT. I have long been a critic because he accumulated stats by beating the slower RTs and didn't match up against the better LT.

As a linebacker Burgess will have to rely more on timing on blitzes and he may be matched against any player on the line. That includes TE that are as fast as he is, but that he may be able to overpower and also fast strong LTs and much larger LGs that can clog him up at the line.

In the past several years, he hasn't produced sacks despite his complete disregard for plugging the running lanes. He simply went for sacks every time. At linebacker, Burgess will be forced to plug running gaps. We really have no idea how good he is at doing so. If we do, then we know he does it poorly.

Burgess being a pass rusher will be in on passing downs and will have to adjust to dropping into coverage occasionally. This is something he was rarely required to do in a Raiders uniform. Expect opposing defenses to attack him through the air.

That said, at times last season it was clear Burgess was not putting in the effort. If his effort level increases in New England like Randy Moss, he can register 8 or more sacks.

I was holding out hope that we were able to swindle New England for one of its three 3rd round picks in 2010, but I guess not.


Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"][/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario

2012 NFL Strength of Schedule

  Disclaimer Some strength of schedule models calculate strength of schedule based on the opponents the team has faced to date.  My model calculates strength of schedule based on all the opponents on a team's schedule.  The reason for this is because it reduces weekly fluctuations. For example, when a team plays their Week 17 game, in the traditional model their strength of schedule would change by 31 games...their Week 17 opponent's 16 games plus the additional game played by each of their prior 15 opponents.  In my model, when a team plays their Week 17 game their strength of schedule will only change by 15 additional game for each of the opponents on their schedule.