Skip to main content

Who is Paul Hackett?

First in a series exploring the 2009 Oakland Raiders coaching staff.

So who is this guy that is coaching young JaMarcus Russell and is he any good?

You may know a little about Paul Hackett's infamous tenure as USC Head Coach. Obviously in college football, recruiting is half the battle. So lets looks at his performance as coach related to team success in his coaching areas. Specifically offenses and QBs.



From 1993 to 1997 Paul Hackett led the Kansas City Chiefs offense to four playoff appearances in five seasons
QBs: Joe Montana 2 seasons, Steve Bono 2, Elvis Grbac 1
RBs: Marcus Allen 4, Greg Hill 1
WRs: Willie Davis 3, Chris Penn 1, Andre Rison 1

1998-2000: USC HC

2001: OC NY Jets
Offense Rank: 16
331.7 YPG
QB: Vinny Testaverde
RB: Curtis Martin
WR: Laveranues Coles
Lost to Raiders in First Round of Playoffs

2002 OC NY Jets
Offense Rank: 22
314.8 YPG
QB: Chad Pennington
RB: Curtis Martin
WR: Laveranues Coles
Lost to Raiders in First Round of Playoffs

2003 OC NY Jets
Offense Rank: 19
309.4 YPG
QB: Chad Pennington/Vinny Testaverde
RB: Curtis Martin
WR: Santana Moss

2004 OC NY Jets
Offense Rank: 12
339.9 YPG
QB: Chad Pennington
RB: Curtis Martin
WR: Santana Moss/Justin McCareins

2005 QB Coach Tampa Bay Bucs
181 YPG Rank: 25
62.2% Completions Rank: 10
6.5 YP/A Rank: 19
QBs: Brian Griese 6 games, Chris Simms 11 games*
*1 Playoff Game

2006 QB Coach Tampa Bay Bucs
175 YPG Rank: 26
55.3% Completions Rank: 28
5.6 YP/A Rank: 32
QBs: Chris Simms 3 Games, Bruce Gradkowski 10.5, Tim Rattay 2.5
Editorial Note: We don't want Gradkowski to play.

2007 QB Coach Tampa Bay Bucs
210 YPG Rank: 16
64.5% Completions Rank: 6
7.3 YP/A Rank: 8
QBs: Jeff Garcia 13 Games*, Bruce Gradkowski 1 game, Luke McCown 4 games
*1 Playoff Game

Hackett has been primarily successful when he has had offensive weapons and a decent QB. When his primary QB is sidelined his offenses and passing game have struggled. He has managed to keep his offenses and passing game respectable outside of the 2006 Bruce Gradkowski experiment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario

2012 NFL Strength of Schedule

  Disclaimer Some strength of schedule models calculate strength of schedule based on the opponents the team has faced to date.  My model calculates strength of schedule based on all the opponents on a team's schedule.  The reason for this is because it reduces weekly fluctuations. For example, when a team plays their Week 17 game, in the traditional model their strength of schedule would change by 31 games...their Week 17 opponent's 16 games plus the additional game played by each of their prior 15 opponents.  In my model, when a team plays their Week 17 game their strength of schedule will only change by 15 games...one additional game for each of the opponents on their schedule.