Skip to main content

Needs Index Week 2: Flippers Give Grove $29 Million,


Jake Grove has officially signed with the Fins. He will get $14.5 million guaranteed. $29 Million total over the five-year contract.

This was probably a bit more than the Raiders were willing to pay for Grove, who has missed the better part of his career with injuries so far. It is a bit surprising, because the Cable had spoken so highly of Grove at the combine and considering Gallery is one of his best friends. Remember the wise words of Tim Brown. A team never losses a free agent they want to keep. If we were willing to go this high on Grove, I think parts of Raider nation would have been upset, but if we wanted to keep him, I have no doubt we would have.

I think Grove finally elevated his play last season, but I don't blame the Raiders for not putting that kind of money into a severe injury concern. Who knows if Grove will be able to keep up this level of play next season. This is a risk the Dolphins could take. He is obviously talented, but with only two healthy seasons and one real productive one, it was calculated risk the Raiders weren't willing to take. At least not for $14.5 Million in guaranteed money.

That leaves Gallery, Henderson, McQuistan, Wade and Green on the Offensive Line.

Marvel Smith has been linked to the Raiders as well as Khalif Barnes. Barnes is a pile of crud at LT and Marvel Smith has major injury concerns, but is a good LT. Barnes may be capable at RT if we are comfortable with Henderson at LT or we make one of them a backup.

Carlisle may rejoin the team as well, having called off visits to other teams.

I could envision Marvel Smith being a great bargain as a solution to our LT problem. Obviously, teams need to see if he is healthy. The greatest concern of mine is still the offensive line, because without a decent one, running the ball and passing is much harder. With a stable of good runningbacks, a young QB, and a herd of young wide receivers, the line could end up being vitally important to our success or failure.

For the first time in a long time, I have no idea what the Raiders are going to do. I think we have been lucky is recent years to have a pretty good idea of what the Raiders were going to do in the draft and in free agency.

Interesting side story: Because NFL teams spent too little last season, the cap floor and ceiling have been increased this year. What is interesting to note about this, was that without the Hall, Walker, Kelly, Wilson deals, the Raiders would have been one of the teams underspending and therefore creating the huge cap this season.

Money would have been better spent perhaps locking up Asomugha last season and/or extending Morrison and Howard.

There are still plenty of holes on defense. Who will play safety? Are we standing pat with our DTs? Will we add a pass rushing DE? Is Ricky Brown the solution at SAM LB?

The Raider Nation Station Needs Index (as of 03/03/09):
1. OT - Last Week 1 (Green is still starting RT)
2. RG - LW 3 (Carlisle Shopping himself)
3. DE - LW 2 (Edwards Cut, Burgess in final year, Richarson lacks pass rushing skill)
4. DT - LW 4 (Sands, Warren, Kelly are an expensive trio, one will go)
5. C  - LW 8 (Grove to Fins)
6. WR - LW 6 (Walker may stay, but this group still needs help)
7. SS - LW 7 (Wilson Cut)
8. OLB - LW 5 (Ricky Brown the solution?)
9. OL - LW 9 (Quality depth no the offensive line is important)
10. FS - LW 10 (Huff is still on the roster but for how long?)

Note: Last week's index wasn't published due to a error on my part. I have merged the comments as part of this week's index.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario

2012 NFL Strength of Schedule

  Disclaimer Some strength of schedule models calculate strength of schedule based on the opponents the team has faced to date.  My model calculates strength of schedule based on all the opponents on a team's schedule.  The reason for this is because it reduces weekly fluctuations. For example, when a team plays their Week 17 game, in the traditional model their strength of schedule would change by 31 games...their Week 17 opponent's 16 games plus the additional game played by each of their prior 15 opponents.  In my model, when a team plays their Week 17 game their strength of schedule will only change by 15 games...one additional game for each of the opponents on their schedule.