Skip to main content

Kryptonite at Quarterback: Jason Campbell The Answer?

Al Davis’ Raiders have successfully developed only one young quarterback in its history.
 
Daryle Lamonica had played in four seasons prior to joining the Raiders. He developed into “the Mad Bomber” in Oakland, but he wasn’t too bad of a backup prior to joining the Raiders.
 
Jim Plunkett developed later in his career and after sitting on the bench for several seasons. Rich Gannon was hardly a spring chicken and inherited a talented offense.
 
Todd Marinovich, JaMarcus Russell, Andrew Walter and Marc Wilson are good examples of the Raiders failure to develop a young quarterback.
 
Al Davis won three Super Bowls, but the one thing that has eluded him was the ability to develop a young quarterback. Sure he had one, Ken Stabler, but he was the exception, not the rule.
 
One thing Davis has been pretty good at doing is recognizing quarterbacks with the right skill set that might just need a change of scenery. The afformentioned Plunkett, Lamonica and Gannon.
 
He did the same thing with guys like Kerry Collins, Jeff George, Daunte Culpepper, Aaron Brooks and Josh McCown with less success. He is doing it with Bruce Gradkowski, and Charlie Frye. He brought in J.P Losman. While many of these guys will not develop and they may not wow anyone now or ever, Davis recognizes they might have something left to give.
 
There is value in being an NFL backup or a starter for a few seasons and changing teams. Davis realizes it, but his batting average is below the Mendoza line. Although, maybe it isn’t about batting average when it comes to veteran quarterbacks, maybe it is about quantity. Was Jon Gruden on to something? Maybe in a way, he was.
 
Now that Donovan McNabb is in Washington, what will become of Jason Campbell? This rumor isn’t new, but Jason Campbell will want to be traded.
 
Campbell’s career completion percentage is 61.2% and he has a 55 to 38, touchdown to interception ratio. He passed for 3,618 yards last season, 65 more yards than McNabb and ahead of Matt Ryan, Carson Palmer, and Joe Flacco.
 
Campbell had just two less touchdowns than McNabb, but with a putrid running game and a stable of unimpressive receivers, that is no surprise.
 
The Raiders would be foolish not to pursue Jason Campbell and be willing to give up to a third round pick for him.
 
I am not saying Campbell should come in and start, but he can provide stiff competition for Russell and Gradkowski and turn an otherwise intriguing quarterback competition into a very captivating one.
 
I’d support Campbell for a third round pick, preferring of course to get him for less. Would you? The new poll question.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea
Post a Comment
Read more

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario
Post a Comment
Read more

2012 NFL Strength of Schedule

  Disclaimer Some strength of schedule models calculate strength of schedule based on the opponents the team has faced to date.  My model calculates strength of schedule based on all the opponents on a team's schedule.  The reason for this is because it reduces weekly fluctuations. For example, when a team plays their Week 17 game, in the traditional model their strength of schedule would change by 31 games...their Week 17 opponent's 16 games plus the additional game played by each of their prior 15 opponents.  In my model, when a team plays their Week 17 game their strength of schedule will only change by 15 games...one additional game for each of the opponents on their schedule.
2 comments
Read more